Blog

Dominique Cosmetics Chilly coronary heart, electrical soul, fairly wild stunning mess of liquid eye colours, scores & swatches


Cold heart

Dominique Cosmetics Cold Heart Beautiful Mess Liquid Eyeshadow ($ 20.00 for 0.27 oz.) Is a light medium blue base with cooler gold flecks throughout. The base had a rather matte finish that tended to emphasize the lid’s structure and get chunky as it built (which the formula was supposed to do!). The texture was thin, more watery, and one of the most difficult to apply with a sense of evenness from the area.

It had a sheer, uneven coverage that dried out fairly quickly and was used for the whole day (10 hours with no fading / wrinkling). When I tried applying a second or third coat for greater opacity, the product looked unevenly thick and was more prone to peeling / cracking. I would recommend using a fluffy, synthetic brush to brush everything all over the lid … and it’s best if you’re someone who wants a bit of “nice mess” on the lids.

MORE READING: Formula overview for details on general performance and properties (such as fragrance).

Sydney Grace Ride the Wave (P, $ 8.00) is shimmery, darker, warmer (90% similar). Giorgio Armani Jade (03) (DC, $ 39.00) is shimmery, lighter, warmer (90% similar); Dior Contraste Horizon # 5 (LE,) is shimmery, darker (90% similar). JD Glow Bora Bora (P, $ 7.50) is more shimmery, brighter, brighter (90% similar). City Color Breezy (P, $ 6.99) is shimmery, brighter, warmer (85% similar). Buxom Schmooze (P, $ 12.00) is more shimmery, lighter, more pigmented (85% similar). Color Pop Pop Rocks (LE, $ 6.00) is shimmery, darker, more pigmented (85)% similar); MAC Teal Appeal (P, $ 17.00) is shimmery, darker (80% similar); Clionadh Arctic Circle (P, $ 5.00) is shimmery, brighter, lighter (80% similar); Sugarpill Holy Ghost (P, $ 13.00) is darker, cooler (80% similar).

Formula overview

$ 20.00 / 0.27 oz. – – $ 74.07 per ounce

The formula should be “mixable, buildable, [and] foolproof “and comes in three flavors. The formula varied widely from shade to shade in terms of consistency, pigmentation, application, and longevity … it’s extremely inconsistent to the point where I’m not sure why the brand is making this one brought out together and / or did not provide a more detailed breakdown of each shade.

Most shades dried out pretty quickly, advocating a transfer-resistant and long-lasting finish, but the battle came when they were layered – built up in cover as marketed – and got thicker, more uneven, and then I experienced a bit of peeling. The clear shades tended to be applied more unevenly, so it took some effort to apply and spread while maintaining coverage (a fingertip often absorbed half of the product applied!). I found a fluffy, synthetic brush that worked best for spreading and softening the layer of product without creating more bumps or stains.

The formula was more watery than not, although one shade, Shy Girl, was the outlier as it was opaque, thicker, and fairly evenly applied in a single coat. The other shades were of different strengths, harder to build up, applied unevenly and generally more difficult to work with.

Browse all of our Dominique Cosmetics Beautiful Mess Liquid Eyeshadow swatches.

ingredients

Isododecane, calcium aluminum borosilicate, cyclopentasiloxane, mica, dimethicone, synthetic fluorophlogopite, trimethylsiloxysilicate, silicon dioxide, synthetic beeswax, polymethylsilsesquioxane, polyethylene, hydrogenated styrene / isoprene copolymer acetate, may contain (4.999), iron oxide (CI 779949), iron oxide (CI 779949), iron oxide (CI 779949) (CI 77891),

We hope you can support Temptalia by shopping through our links below. Thank you so much!

Electric soul

Dominique Cosmetics Electric Soul Beautiful Mess Liquid Eyeshadow ($ 20.00 for 0.27 oz.) Has a transparent base with a multi-colored sheen that changed from golden green to light green to lavender. The shift was subtle compared to the multichrome products I’ve tried in the past, but the transparent base made it more forgiving (compared to a black base).

It had a sheer coverage that was easy to build up, but I wouldn’t apply more than two coats (middle coverage) as a third coat (semi-opaque coverage) made the thickness physically uneven and caused some flaking when worn. The consistency was thin, watery, but applied smoother (in terms of thickness), although it was more difficult to get an even layer of product. Fortunately, the glossy, more metallic finish made the imperfections less noticeable in use from a normal viewing distance.

It took 10 hours without fading or peeling as long as I kept it on no more than two coats. I would recommend using the supplied applicator to get an initial top coat, let it dry slightly, and then use a fluffy synthetic brush to level out the layer a bit.

MORE READING: Formula overview for details on general performance and properties (such as fragrance).

Clionadh Ocher (P, $ 15.00) is less shimmery, less pigmented (85% similar). Fyrinnae Fantasy Creatures (P, $ 14.50) is shimmery, darker, warmer (85% similar). Clionadh Foiling (P, $ 7.50) is shimmery, darker, warmer (80% similar). Clionadh Chalice (P, $ 12.50) is shimmery, darker, warmer (80% similar). Clionadh Throne (P, 12.50) , 50 USD) is lighter, brighter, more pigmented (80% similar). Natasha Denona Lime Chrome (PiP, $ 29.00) is shimmery, warmer (80% similar). Natasha Denona Infra-Nude (LE, $ 28.00) is shimmery, darker, warmer (80% similar); Clionadh Corrosion (P, $ 7.50) is shimmery, darker, warmer (80% similar).

Formula overview

$ 20.00 / 0.27 oz. – – $ 74.07 per ounce

The formula should be “mixable, buildable, [and] foolproof “and comes in three flavors. The formula varied widely from shade to shade in terms of consistency, pigmentation, application, and longevity … it’s extremely inconsistent to the point where I’m not sure why the brand is making this one brought out together and / or did not provide a more detailed breakdown of each shade.

Most shades dried out pretty quickly, advocating a transfer-resistant and long-lasting finish, but the battle came when they were layered – built up in cover as marketed – and got thicker, more uneven, and then I experienced a bit of peeling. The clear shades tended to be applied more unevenly, so it took some effort to apply and spread while maintaining coverage (a fingertip often absorbed half of the product applied!). I found a fluffy, synthetic brush that worked best for spreading and softening the layer of product without creating more bumps or stains.

The formula was more watery than not, although one shade, Shy Girl, was the outlier as it was opaque, thicker, and fairly evenly applied in a single coat. The other shades were of different strengths, harder to build up, applied unevenly and generally more difficult to work with.

Browse all of our Dominique Cosmetics Beautiful Mess Liquid Eyeshadow swatches.

ingredients

Water (aqua, eau), silicon dioxide, polyvinylpyrrolidone, butylene glycol, acrylates / ethylhexyl acrylate copolymer, acrylates / dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate copolymer, diglycerin, tetrahydroxypropylethylenediamine, phenoxyethanol, PEG-240 / HDI-copolyethcethol-acrylate / C10-30-acrylate Fragrance), benzyl benzoate, may contain (+/-): titanium dioxide (CI 77891), iron oxides (CI 77491, CI 77499)

We hope you can support Temptalia by shopping through our links below. Thank you so much!

Pretty wild

Dominique Cosmetics Pretty Wild Beautiful Mess Liquid Eyeshadow ($ 20.00 for 0.27 oz.) Had a transparent base and a metallic sheen that changed from warm, light green to warmer gold to copper. The shimmer was bigger so it had a chunkier finish compared to Electric Soul. It had medium coverage in a single layer, which was a bit buildable, but it was fussy to work with to get an even layer of product that actually looked even.

The watery, thin texture tended to look streaky as the included applicator was an absolute nightmare when it pushed around the shimmer and left bald patches. I would bypass the applicator entirely when working with this shade as it only made life miserable. The best method I came across was using a flat synthetic brush to pick up the product and gently squeezing the product onto my lid. I let it dry for a few seconds and then used a fluffy synthetic brush to gently spread and mix the product without disturbing it too much.

Once dried, it wore on for 10 hours without fading / peeling, although I would be careful about applying the second or third layer as it was more prone to peeling and highlighting the lid structure (with noticeable lumpiness) as you stack it up … so Not a particularly buildable formula in experience – at least not in practice.

MORE READING: Formula overview for details on general performance and properties (such as fragrance).

Clionadh Vermillion (P, $ 15.00) is less shimmery, darker, less pigmented (85% similar). Natasha Denona Ultraviolet (LE, $ 28.00) is shimmery, darker, cooler (85% similar). Natasha Denona Infra-Nude (LE, $ 28.00) is more shimmery, pigmented, cooler (85% similar). Clionadh Burnt Sienna (P, $ 15.00) is shimmery, lighter, pigmented (80% similar). Clionadh Foiling (P, $ 7.50) is shimmery, warmer (80% similar). Clionadh Mosaic (P, $ 12.50) is shimmery, darker, cooler (80% similar). Clionadh Ornamental (P, $ 7.50) is shimmery, lighter, warmer (80% similar). Clionadh Heiress (P., $ 12.50) is more shimmery, pigmented, warmer (80% similar). Clionadh Rose Line (P, $ 12.50) is shimmering, darker, cooler (80% similar). Clionadh Chalice (P, $ 12.50) is more shimmery, more pigmented, warmer (80% similar).

Formula overview

$ 20.00 / 0.27 oz. – – $ 74.07 per ounce

The formula should be “mixable, buildable, [and] foolproof “and comes in three flavors. The formula varied widely from shade to shade in terms of consistency, pigmentation, application, and longevity … it’s extremely inconsistent to the point where I’m not sure why the brand is making this one brought out together and / or did not provide a more detailed breakdown of each shade.

Most shades dried out pretty quickly, advocating a transfer-resistant and long-lasting finish, but the battle came when they were layered – built up in cover as marketed – and got thicker, more uneven, and then I experienced a bit of peeling. The sheer hues tended to apply more unevenly, so it took some effort to apply and spread while maintaining coverage (a fingertip often absorbed half of the product applied!). I found a fluffy synthetic brush that worked best for spreading and softening the layer of product without creating more bumps or stains.

The formula was more watery than not, although one shade, Shy Girl, was the outlier as it was opaque, thicker, and fairly evenly applied in a single coat. The other colors were plain, harder to build, unevenly applied and generally more difficult to work with.

Browse all of our Dominique Cosmetics Beautiful Mess Liquid Eyeshadow swatches.

ingredients

Water (aqua, eau), silicon dioxide, polyvinylpyrrolidone, butylene glycol, acrylates / ethylhexyl acrylate copolymer, acrylates / dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate copolymer, diglycerin, tetrahydroxypropylethylenediamine, phenoxyethanol, PEG-240 / HDI-copolyethcethol-acrylate / C10-30-acrylate Fragrance), benzyl benzoate, contain (+/-): titanium dioxide (CI 77891), iron oxide (CI 77491, CI 77499)

We hope you can support Temptalia by shopping through our links below. Thank you so much!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *